AI for patent monetization · live

Claim charts,
in hours not weeks.

EoU parses patent claims, pulls prosecution history, searches public product evidence, and generates litigation-ready claim charts with verifiable citations. Purpose-built for PAEs, boutique IP, and in-house teams.

99.4% citation accuracy · every source verified

Means-plus-function, Jepson, and dependent chains handled

SOC 2 compliant · no training on your data

Export to Word in standard litigation format

eou / case-2041-A / matter-18

01 INTAKE02 PARSE03 SEARCH04 CHART

US PATENT 11,042,811 B2

Networked device with encrypted payload handling

CLAIM 1

a processor; a memory coupled to said processor; storing instructions to receive encrypted payloads; a transceiver configured to decrypt said payloads; using a session key derived from a shared secret.

EVIDENCE DISCOVERY

○product-docs/datasheet-042.pdf

○api.acme.com/reference/v2

○acme.com/whitepapers/security.pdf

○github.com/acme/sdk-examples

○sec.gov/10-K/2024/acme.txt

○standards.ieee.org/1609-2.pdf

CLAIM CHART · DRAFT

1.aa processor

—

1.ba memory coupled to said processor

—

1.cstoring instructions to receive encrypted payloads

—

1.da transceiver configured to decrypt said payloads

—

1.eusing a session key derived from a shared secret

—

US PATENT LITIGATION +22% YoYUPC FILINGS +54% YoY4,000+ CASES FILED ANNUALLY$500M–$1B NPE CHART SPENDCITATION ACCURACY 99.4%10× PRODUCTIVITY GAINUS PATENT LITIGATION +22% YoYUPC FILINGS +54% YoY4,000+ CASES FILED ANNUALLY$500M–$1B NPE CHART SPENDCITATION ACCURACY 99.4%10× PRODUCTIVITY GAIN

40–0h

current time per chart

<0h

with EoU, start to draft

$0K+

outside counsel, per chart

citation accuracy

§ 01 · The Problem

You know the number: 40 to 60 hours.
The tooling has not moved in a generation.

Patent claim charts are the foundational work product in infringement litigation and licensing. And they're prepared almost exactly the way they were twenty years ago — by associates, one element at a time, billed by the hour.

Outside counsel runs $15,000 to $50,000 per chart. In-house teams absorb 40–60 attorney hours each. PAEs can't scale licensing campaigns without scaling headcount. Boutiques are turning cases away.

Claim parsing6–8 h

Prosecution history8–12 h

Evidence discovery12–20 h

Mapping + drafting14–20 h

§ 02 · How it works

Patent to claim chart, end to end, in a single session.

The workflow is purpose-built for infringement work. Human review is required at every stage — we accelerate attorneys, we don't replace them.

STEP 01 / 05

Intake

Drop a US patent number or PDF. We pull the file wrapper from USPTO PAIR in the background.

STEP 02 / 05

Parse

Claims break into elements. Means-plus-function, Jepson, and dependent chains handled properly.

STEP 03 / 05

Discover

Search product docs, datasheets, APIs, SDKs, SEC filings, standards bodies — scored and ranked.

STEP 04 / 05

Map

Each element matched to evidence with confidence score. Weak or missing elements flagged.

STEP 05 / 05

Export

Litigation-ready Word output with inline citations. Every citation links to a real, verifiable source.

§ 03 · ROI

The math isn't subtle.

At typical PAE volumes, a $50K/year EoU seat replaces $1–2M in outside counsel spend. Move the sliders for your own numbers.

Typical PAE campaign50–200 charts/yr

Outside counsel rate$15K–$50K/chart

EoU blended cost~$1,200/chart

Charts per year60

Your current cost per chart$25,000

Current spend$1,500,000

With EoU$72,000

Annual savings

$1,428,000

+ 2,880 hrs
back to partners

§ 04 · Who uses EoU

Three distinct customers. One workflow.

PAE / NPE LICENSING

Scale a campaign without scaling headcount.

Run 200 targets against 40 patents on a fixed seat budget. Every dollar saved on chart prep flows to the bottom line.

Typical customer50–200 charts/yr

BOUTIQUE IP LITIGATION

Take the cases you had to turn away.

Contingency and AFA economics reward efficiency. Put partners on strategy, not on 60-hour element maps.

Capacity unlock3–5× more matters

FORTUNE 500 IN-HOUSE

Cut outside counsel spend by an order of magnitude.

Get to a credible merits view before you sign a retainer. Counter-assert from a defensible footing in weeks, not months.

Fully-loaded cost−80% per matter

§ 05 · What it replaces

Measured against what you do today.

	EVIDENCE OF USE	BIGLAW OUTSIDE COUNSEL	CHATGPT / CLAUDE DIRECT	JUNIOR ASSOCIATE IN-HOUSE
Time to draft chart	< 2 hours	2–4 weeks	hours (unreliable)	40–60 hours
Cost per chart	~$1,200	$15–50K	~$0	$5–10K loaded
Citation accuracy	99.4% verified	high, variable	hallucinates	medium
Prosecution history	auto-ingested	manual	no	manual
Means-plus-function	112(f) aware	case-by-case	no	depends
Privilege & audit trail	built in	built in	absent	variable

Trusted by licensing & litigation teams

INTELLECTUAL VENTURES

WSOU

ACACIA

IPVALUE

DESMARAIS

McKOOL SMITH

RUSS AUGUST

REICHMAN JORGENSEN

QUALCOMM IP

INTERDIGITAL

PENDRELL

SISVEL

LOGOS ILLUSTRATIVE · PLACEHOLDER

§ 06 · Get started

Stop billing hours for work
a machine should have done.

30-minute demo on your own patent. We'll run it live, show you the citations, and you'll have a draft chart before the call ends.

Claim charts,in hours not weeks.

You know the number: 40 to 60 hours.The tooling has not moved in a generation.